ZF2CA – more comments from Colin

Thanks for your kind words Bob. To add some colour, the basic SO2R set-up is a pair of K3s using DxLog in ’SO2R Advanced’ (that I am familiar with) with amps and duplexers to the various beams (rather more of a handful). The complexity lies in that it also has a full remote capability with an IT backbone that is both invisible and impenetrable to mere mortals. After that its just a matter of remembering where the sun is (it’s quite hard to tell from within the shack – the duplexers now cover the windows!), and what time tea is in VK/ZL 😊. I try to think and live in GMT and then remember that the sun is 80 degrees phase shifted.

73, Colin ZF2CA, G4CWH, M3E

VE3BR

1. I like this contest a lot. It does not matter to me that my reasons are selfish and of “make me feel better” kind – we all deserve a little boost now and then. I consider myself not even a “small pistol” amongst “big guns” but rather a “pellet gun” or a “BB gun”. The format audience and scoring system of the BERU contest all work very well to rub my fragile ego the right way. “Linear” rather than “exponential” scoring does not leave the weaklings with a typical for other contests minuscule fraction of the winner’s result. Feeling more like one is “in the game” works for me.

2. 12 hours vs 24 hours. It has been many attempts now and I have yet to put in a “full-time” effort. One reason is that I am officially a senior now. The other is my setup resulting in what I can hear drying up rather quickly with subsequent long periods of “nothing to work” drudgery. The scoring format helps in that decision too: there is always a chance that you stumble upon a juicy bonus pointer in the midst of a desert (or in the emptiness of an ice floe). So 24 hours it is even though this year I put in just over 17 and again found myself asleep in the chair towards the end.

3. Conditions I think were significantly down from the last year. One of the CCO members has rightly asked “OK who gave the 10m band the day off???” Also 80m was extremely noisy here likely some exchanges logged will turn out not to be correct. So be it you can’t be asking for repeats forever.

4. Well there is always “next year”. And I am looking forward to it!

VE3BR

VK2IG

This year seemed a little busier than last year; but only 5B 5Z 6Y 9H and ZF worked outside Gx VE VK and ZL. 80m very quiet with VK/ZL (and JA) being heard; 15m plagued by variable propagation and fierce multipath echoes making it hard to copy callsigns and serials. Thunderstorms stayed away this year so little QRN. Plenty of BERU traffic during VK Saturday night / early Sunday and early Sunday evening, with Sunday daytime being relatively quiet. It was another enjoyable contest – thanks to everyone who answered my calls and my apologies to those who I couldn’t hear. Looking forward to next year’s contest! VK2IG

9H1CG

Good morning Bob,

What a pleasant surprise to find your email when I opened my mailbox this morning. 

This comes 50 years after making it to 5th place in the 1974 BERU Contest. I first took part in the contest in 1971. BERU was very different then as was the equipment used. It was a 48 hour contest and my first participation was made with an AR88 receiver, a home brew 2×807 cw transmitter, and a wet strings on the roof. TX/RX antenna switching was manual and the home brew electronic keyer was a bit of a marvel in itself, with a modified switch from a telephone system used as a paddle, but given your G3 callsign you probably know all about this. Nonetheless, around 450 QSOs were made. By the time 1974 came, a Trio TS510 was in use and this time round an ICOM IC7300.

Band conditions were not at their best this time round, but did provide some good dx QSOs. I would love to see some more Commonwealth countries participating in BERU. There is activity, though not as much as in the old days, but there are stations across the Commonwealth who could easily put in an appearance if not be there for the whole contest. Unfortunately CW activity has declined across the board, and disappointing band conditions in this and last cycle have not helped either.

I will let you have that picture you requested by this weekend.


73, Joe 9H1CG


Building Participation next steps

One idea I had was to make up a more interesting results package. Put simply this would be a combination of the RadCom report ( comes out in June /July) with the results table from HFCC pages, but could include a bit more of general interest e.g. soapbox comment.

This combined results package would be sent via email to all non UK entrants and other participants. Also we could encourgae non-UK contest clubs to carry some of this.

I guess this would need some co-operation from RSGB/RadCom but could help their international membership positioning too.

73 Bob G3PJT

Building Participation

The data mining exercise seems to have resulted in 5 not-seen-before callsigns entering and I think more than that taking part but without uploading; this will be revealed when the logs go public. So a little help, but also a little disappointing.  At a hit rate of 1.5% from the emails to known active contesters sent out, some marketeers might say ‘a typical result, don’t be discouraged’.

But getting here revealed something unexpected: Of the 100+ non-G entries we annually get, since 2002 there have been 713 unique non-G callsigns, so a high degree of churn and far higher than I would have guessed. This number is obviously bulked up by all the travellers, but has had HQ stations and obvious contest call dupes removed. It still seems large.

I am also involved on the committees of a gliding club and a classical concert club and both have very similar and national problems of ageing memberships, stalwart members and committee types who will keep coming back until they drop, and those that stay for a while with a half-life of perhaps 5-7 years. In all cases the annual SK levy is the only mechanism limiting the average age raise. Indeed, my joining the concert club committee brought down its average age by about 5 years and I’m no spring chicken. The common factors are retention, marketing and recruitment.

So, how to inspire the next generation of intrepids? This is surely the same group that furniture industry targets? –  the twenty-somethings and 55+ who have money and time available – indeed I started being a Traveller at around 55.

Here’s a few ideas to add to the brainstorm (its brainstorm rules – no idea too daft!):

  • Bob G3PJT’s work with his book, convention talk and Radcom articles gave a significant uptick – perhaps we need more of all this?
  • Do we need explicit articles in Radcom encouraging the next generation of travellers? (I’ll volunteer to write one – Travellers, expect to be tapped up for pics and stories).
  • Can we encourage those youngsters we meet at our clubs (whether 20+ or 55+) to take the plunge? If all of us do this there will be a few converts.
  • This of course can all be replicated throughout the Commonwealth too – hint…   (but well done on your podcasts Kevin VK6T!)
  • Survey a selection of the departed calls to see why they lost interest? That many cannot all have aged out. See what we can learn.
  • Consider how to deliver greater satisfaction especially to the rarer Commonwealth participants – Special certificates? Other regional awards?
  • Is increasing noise a significant contribution? Can this be mitigated by encouraging /P operations with a specific award or section?
  • Stand outside the gates of appropriate schools peddling this, our drug of choice. Ok, I jest, but Gary ZL2IFB and I attended to the same school with a radio club, and had someone come and given lecture on this we would have sat up and listened.
  • Promote the CW Academy through the Commonwealth, and to promote BERU as a form of finishing school – particularly as we operate a lot at 24wpm.
  • Create a bank of Traveller equipment for youngsters to borrow? Even consider sponsorship for under 25s?

73, Colin ZF2CA, G4CWH, VP9/G4CWH, M3E

Preliminary participation 2024

These are early statistics from the entries so far. 2024 was slightly below average level of participation.

Open entries are about average ( based on the past 11 years ) but Restricted are below average

Entries by region. UK, ZL and the Rest of the Commonwealth are below average but VE and VK are at expected average levels

And the percentage of entrants using assistance continues to increase

Dont read too much into all of this as the data has plenty of noise in it.

73 Bob G3PJT

COMMONWEALTH CONTEST G3WRR

To paraphrase an advert from some years ago, “You’ve read the best now read (one of the) rest”….. 

Did my usual Jolly Jaunt to the Isle of Wight for a Restricted SOU section BERU entry from the top of the cliffs near Brighstone …. :

80m – 9 QSOs 

40m – 32 QSOs

20m – 41 QSOs

15m – 40 QSOs

10m – 7 QSOs.

Antennas were a 14AVQ (40/20/25/10m) and 40ft vertical (80m).

No original comments on conditions in addition to these already made (and with which I pretty much agree). Survived the contest itself on 3 Pot Noodles and a couple of Bovril sandwiches plus lots of cups of tea…although meals in the local hostelry on Friday and Sunday nights did help.  

But the real point of making a report at all is to say that I concur with the views already expressed that although something needs to be done to re-energise BERU, I think that the “UK works UK” proposal would be counterproductive, and that as Steve GW0ETF so well describes it, it would end up as a glorified all band CC! One of the great things about BERU is that it is HARD (for us little antenna merchants anyway) and allowing a (relatively) easy option would risk destroying the current essence of the event.. But that said I can’t think of any viable  alternative (sad or what?!)

73 and looking forward to next year, Quin G3WRR